Hilary commented on a
post a couple weeks ago:
"So, Betsy, are you going to go for the Sister Servants?
I have to say, of all the neo-Cath groups, I think I like the looks of them the best. I looked and looked but I think these are the only ones that have catechetics as their exclusive apostolate, which, I personally feel, is the most pressing task of the Church. I just can't get on the wagon with the idea of wasting trained religious specialists on teaching home economics or chemistry ..."
First: I would object to the application of the term "neo-Cath," because all things authentically Catholic (and the Sr. Servants are authentically Catholic, for sure,) are in some way timeless as the Church is herself. Holy Mother Church is ancient, and wondrously young and ever new, all at the same time.
So, I do not refer to the various Orders of Celebration by the terms "Old" and "New" Mass. The Mass is the Mass, has been and always shall be, the Mass. And I take care not to refer to religious communities that utilize previously promulgated editions of the Order of Celebration as "Traditional." Catholicism is Traditional. If a religious community is not Traditional, then, regardless of which Order of the Mass it uses, it is not Catholic at all.
Secondly: I am settled, for my part, on the Sister Servants. This is very much a two way street, however. My brother could not walk down the street, point at a girl, and announce to her the fact that they were to be married. No, indeed, he might be arrested for his moxi. So I can hardly presume to do what amounts to the same thing where religious life is concerned. And of course, the Lord may also, at some point, put in a contrary word of His own.
Thirdly: One of the things I looked for in a religious community was a primary emphasis on the spiritual works of mercy. That is, I did not feel the particular calling to devote myself to the corporal works of mercy, to nursing, or service to the materially poor. I was interested in teaching, as far as that meant teaching religion. This is because I feel that the salvation of souls, in the strict sense, is and should be the primary mission and apostolate of the Church.
It was also because I want to "break the alabaster jar of my life" at the feet of Jesus, for my life to serve no worldly purpose whatsoever, to waste my life for Jesus. Even atheists see the human benefits of nursing, of caring for the poor, of teaching English and biology and chemistry. But contemplative nuns, who serve only in the spiritual realm, are utterly useless to the World. The World sees their radical, total consecration to the spiritual battle and declares their lives a waste. And that is why an exclusively spiritual apostolate is such a strong witness to the Truth of the Lord Jesus. If Jesus is not the Christ, then their lives
are a waste.
As for the issue you raised, about having some religious Sisters "wasted" teaching secular subjects ... you have a point. Once, religious congregations staffed entire schools, and it was only right that one Sister should teach science, another English, another religion. Now, there are much fewer Sisters, and those that remain are badly needed to teach religion ...
That being the case, there is something to be said for the idea that it is valuable to have biology, chemistry, English, and all the rest taught from the perspective of a consecrated religious. And as far as Dominican Sisters (who very often do the teaching,) go, in Dominican spirituality, knowledge is good for its own sake, and the Truth is to be pursued in all fields, including secular ones.